Addepto vs Persistent Systems: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Addepto (4.3/5) edges ahead of Persistent Systems (4.0/5) overall. Addepto is the better choice for manufacturers connecting AI to engineering data. Persistent Systems is the stronger option for cost-conscious enterprises with offshore teams. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Addepto vs Persistent Systems: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Addepto | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2018 | 1990 |
| HQ | Warsaw, Poland | Pune, India |
| Team size | 50–249 | 28,600+ |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM | Offshore engineering scale with its own gen-AI delivery platform |
| Pricing model | Fixed-scope projects and time & materials; $50–$99/hr (Clutch band) | Time & materials and dedicated teams; rates on request |
| Min. engagement | $10,000+ (Clutch) | Not disclosed |
| Primary tech stack | Databricks, Azure OpenAI, Snowflake | Salesforce, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock |
| Industries served | Manufacturing, Energy, Logistics, Retail & e-commerce | Healthcare, Financial services, Telecom, Manufacturing |
Addepto vs Persistent Systems: overview
Addepto
Addepto was founded in Warsaw in 2018 and employs 50–100 people according to most directories (Clutch shows 50–249). KMS Technology acquired it in December 2025, and it continues as an independent subsidiary. Its focus is unusual. The integration work leans toward industrial and engineering data, connecting AI to supervisory control (SCADA), computer-aided design (CAD), and product lifecycle management (PLM) systems alongside more common document and analytics projects. Clutch lists a $10,000 minimum and a $50–$99 hourly band, one of the more accessible entry points on this list.
Persistent Systems
Persistent Systems is a Pune-based software engineering company founded in 1990, with 28,640 employees as of June 2026, most of them in India. It built SASVA, an in-house generative AI platform for software delivery, and has filed 35 patents around it (per company annual report). Its staff hold more than 1,000 Salesforce AI Associate credentials, and it partners with Microsoft, AWS, and Google Cloud. Revenue grew for its 25th straight quarter in Q1 FY27.
Services and capabilities: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
| Capability | Addepto | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| CRM / ERP integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| LLM API gateway & cost control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Document processing | ✓ | ✗ |
| Conversational AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Agentic workflows | ✗ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price pilot | ✗ | ✗ |
| Managed services after launch | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
| Framework / platform | Addepto | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Salesforce | N/A | ✓ |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 | N/A | N/A |
| HubSpot | N/A | N/A |
| Snowflake | ✓ | ✓ |
| Databricks | ✓ | ✓ |
| BigQuery | N/A | N/A |
| Azure OpenAI | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS Bedrock | N/A | ✓ |
| Zendesk | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
| Criterion | Addepto | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10,000+ (Clutch) | Not disclosed |
| Engagement models | Fixed-scope project, Time & materials | Time & materials, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Not public |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
| Dimension | Addepto | Persistent Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Enterprise |
| Best industries | Manufacturing, Energy, Logistics | Healthcare, Financial services, Telecom |
| Best use cases | Search across CAD and PLM records with an LLM front end, Predictive maintenance from SCADA sensor history | Offshore Salesforce AI implementation teams, Healthcare data integrations ahead of AI features |
| Typical project type | Fixed-scope project | Time & materials |
Addepto vs Persistent Systems: pros and cons
| Addepto | |
|---|---|
| + | The $10K Clutch minimum lets small teams test an integration without a large commitment. |
| + | Experience with plant and engineering systems most AI vendors don't touch. |
| + | Clutch reviews average close to 4.9. |
| + | Data engineering and AI are scoped by the same team. |
| - | Acquired by KMS Technology in December 2025; long-term pricing and branding may change |
| - | Headcount varies a lot between directories |
| - | No managed-service offer for running systems after launch |
| Persistent Systems | |
|---|---|
| + | Lower blended rates than U.S. or European integrators of similar size. |
| + | More than 1,000 Salesforce AI credentials across the staff. |
| + | SASVA platform aims to speed up delivery of the integration code itself. |
| + | Steady financial track record. |
| - | Mostly India-based delivery, with limited overlap for U.S. West Coast teams |
| - | Little visible packaging for a fixed-price pilot |
| - | Generalist engineering firm; AI integration is one of many lines |
Who should choose Addepto?
A typical fit: search across CAD and PLM records with an LLM front end.
Integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM. Minimum engagement starts at $10,000+ (Clutch). Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Energy, Logistics, Retail & e-commerce.
Who should choose Persistent Systems?
A typical fit: offshore Salesforce AI implementation teams.
Offshore engineering scale with its own gen-AI delivery platform. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Financial services, Telecom, Manufacturing.
Decision matrix: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want a priced pilot before committing to a rollout | Neither advertises one; ask for a scoped pilot quote |
| You need someone to run and monitor the system after launch | Neither; plan for your own team to run it |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Addepto ($10,000+ (Clutch)) vs Persistent Systems (Not disclosed) |
| The AI has to read and write in your CRM or ERP | Persistent Systems |
| You need multi-step agents acting across systems | Neither lists agentic work |
| You need a large team for a multi-year program | Persistent Systems |
Use case fit: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
| Use case | Addepto fit | Persistent Systems fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Search across CAD and PLM records with an LLM front end | Strong | Limited | Addepto |
| Predictive maintenance from SCADA sensor history | Strong | Limited | Addepto |
| Offshore Salesforce AI implementation teams | Limited | Strong | Persistent Systems |
| Healthcare data integrations ahead of AI features | Limited | Strong | Persistent Systems |
Verdict: Addepto vs Persistent Systems
Addepto (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Integration Services projects. Integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM.
Persistent Systems (4.0/5) is worth a look if you need healthcare data integrations ahead of AI features. If your situation matches that, Persistent Systems is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Addepto vs Persistent Systems FAQ
Is Addepto better than Persistent Systems?
Addepto (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Addepto's strongest advantage: the $10K Clutch minimum lets small teams test an integration without a large commitment. Persistent Systems's strongest advantage: lower blended rates than U.S. or European integrators of similar size.
How do Addepto and Persistent Systems differ in pricing?
Addepto's pricing: fixed-scope projects and time & materials; $50–$99/hr (Clutch band) with a minimum engagement of $10,000+ (Clutch). Persistent Systems's pricing: time & materials and dedicated teams; rates on request. Any hourly bands shown come from Clutch, not a published rate card, so a scoping call is still needed for a project quote.
Which is better for enterprise: Addepto or Persistent Systems?
Persistent Systems is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Addepto and Persistent Systems?
Addepto's primary differentiator is: integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM. Persistent Systems's primary differentiator is: offshore engineering scale with its own gen-AI delivery platform. They also differ in team size (50–249 vs 28,600+), minimum engagement ($10,000+ (Clutch) vs Not disclosed), and primary industries served (Manufacturing, Energy vs Healthcare, Financial services).
Verify all details directly with each provider before making a decision.