Neurons Lab vs Addepto: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Neurons Lab (4.5/5) edges ahead of Addepto (4.3/5) overall. Neurons Lab is the better choice for banks and insurers piloting AI agents. Addepto is the stronger option for manufacturers connecting AI to engineering data. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Neurons Lab vs Addepto: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Neurons Lab | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| HQ | London, UK | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 50–249 | 50–249 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | AWS Generative AI competency combined with a financial-services client base | Integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM |
| Pricing model | Fixed-scope discovery and pilots, then time & materials; rates on request | Fixed-scope projects and time & materials; $50–$99/hr (Clutch band) |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | $10,000+ (Clutch) |
| Primary tech stack | AWS Bedrock, Amazon SageMaker, LangChain | Databricks, Azure OpenAI, Snowflake |
| Industries served | Financial services, Insurance, Healthcare | Manufacturing, Energy, Logistics, Retail & e-commerce |
Neurons Lab vs Addepto: overview
Neurons Lab
Founded in 2019 and based in London with a second office in Singapore, Neurons Lab is a small AI consultancy of roughly 50–250 people that draws on a wider contractor network. In March 2024 it became one of the first firms to earn the AWS Generative AI competency, and it's an AWS Advanced Tier partner. Its work skews toward banks and insurers that want agents running inside existing compliance controls; HSBC and Visa appear as named clients in third-party listings (independently unverifiable). The firm is smaller than most of this list, but its regulated-industry experience is unusually concentrated for its size.
Addepto
Addepto was founded in Warsaw in 2018 and employs 50–100 people according to most directories (Clutch shows 50–249). KMS Technology acquired it in December 2025, and it continues as an independent subsidiary. Its focus is unusual. The integration work leans toward industrial and engineering data, connecting AI to supervisory control (SCADA), computer-aided design (CAD), and product lifecycle management (PLM) systems alongside more common document and analytics projects. Clutch lists a $10,000 minimum and a $50–$99 hourly band, one of the more accessible entry points on this list.
Services and capabilities: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
| Capability | Neurons Lab | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| CRM / ERP integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| LLM API gateway & cost control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Document processing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Conversational AI | ✓ | ✗ |
| Agentic workflows | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price pilot | ✗ | ✗ |
| Managed services after launch | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
| Framework / platform | Neurons Lab | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Salesforce | ✓ | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 | N/A | N/A |
| HubSpot | N/A | N/A |
| Snowflake | N/A | ✓ |
| Databricks | N/A | ✓ |
| BigQuery | N/A | N/A |
| Azure OpenAI | N/A | ✓ |
| AWS Bedrock | ✓ | N/A |
| Zendesk | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
| Criterion | Neurons Lab | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | $10,000+ (Clutch) |
| Engagement models | Fixed-scope project, Time & materials | Fixed-scope project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
| Dimension | Neurons Lab | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services, Insurance, Healthcare | Manufacturing, Energy, Logistics |
| Best use cases | An agent that prepares KYC (know your customer) case files for an analyst to approve, Claims triage assistants that read policy documents | Search across CAD and PLM records with an LLM front end, Predictive maintenance from SCADA sensor history |
| Typical project type | Fixed-scope project | Fixed-scope project |
Neurons Lab vs Addepto: pros and cons
| Neurons Lab | |
|---|---|
| + | Among the earliest holders of the AWS Generative AI competency, announced March 2024. |
| + | Most case work comes from banking and insurance, where audit trails and approvals are part of the spec. |
| + | Senior consultants run delivery directly on a team this size. |
| + | AWS Public Sector Partner status since September 2024 opens government procurement routes. |
| - | Its client work is concentrated in finance, so references in manufacturing or retail are thin |
| - | Headcount figures conflict between sources, and part of the bench is contracted |
| - | No managed-service option is described for after go-live |
| Addepto | |
|---|---|
| + | The $10K Clutch minimum lets small teams test an integration without a large commitment. |
| + | Experience with plant and engineering systems most AI vendors don't touch. |
| + | Clutch reviews average close to 4.9. |
| + | Data engineering and AI are scoped by the same team. |
| - | Acquired by KMS Technology in December 2025; long-term pricing and branding may change |
| - | Headcount varies a lot between directories |
| - | No managed-service offer for running systems after launch |
Who should choose Neurons Lab?
A typical fit: an agent that prepares KYC (know your customer) case files for an analyst to approve.
AWS Generative AI competency combined with a financial-services client base. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Financial services, Insurance, Healthcare.
Who should choose Addepto?
A typical fit: search across CAD and PLM records with an LLM front end.
Integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM. Minimum engagement starts at $10,000+ (Clutch). Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Energy, Logistics, Retail & e-commerce.
Decision matrix: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want a priced pilot before committing to a rollout | Neither advertises one; ask for a scoped pilot quote |
| You need someone to run and monitor the system after launch | Neither; plan for your own team to run it |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Neurons Lab (Not disclosed) vs Addepto ($10,000+ (Clutch)) |
| The AI has to read and write in your CRM or ERP | Check each profile; neither lists CRM or ERP work |
| You need multi-step agents acting across systems | Neurons Lab |
| You need a large team for a multi-year program | Neurons Lab |
Use case fit: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
| Use case | Neurons Lab fit | Addepto fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| An agent that prepares KYC (know your customer) case files for an analyst to approve | Strong | Limited | Neurons Lab |
| Claims triage assistants that read policy documents | Strong | Limited | Neurons Lab |
| Search across CAD and PLM records with an LLM front end | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
| Predictive maintenance from SCADA sensor history | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
Verdict: Neurons Lab vs Addepto
Neurons Lab (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Integration Services projects. AWS Generative AI competency combined with a financial-services client base.
Addepto (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need predictive maintenance from SCADA sensor history. If your situation matches that, Addepto is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Neurons Lab vs Addepto FAQ
Is Neurons Lab better than Addepto?
Neurons Lab (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Neurons Lab's strongest advantage: among the earliest holders of the AWS Generative AI competency, announced March 2024. Addepto's strongest advantage: the $10K Clutch minimum lets small teams test an integration without a large commitment.
How do Neurons Lab and Addepto differ in pricing?
Neurons Lab's pricing: fixed-scope discovery and pilots, then time & materials; rates on request. Addepto's pricing: fixed-scope projects and time & materials; $50–$99/hr (Clutch band) with a minimum engagement of $10,000+ (Clutch). Any hourly bands shown come from Clutch, not a published rate card, so a scoping call is still needed for a project quote.
Which is better for enterprise: Neurons Lab or Addepto?
Neurons Lab is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Neurons Lab and Addepto?
Neurons Lab's primary differentiator is: AWS Generative AI competency combined with a financial-services client base. Addepto's primary differentiator is: integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM. They also differ in team size (50–249 vs 50–249), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs $10,000+ (Clutch)), and primary industries served (Financial services, Insurance vs Manufacturing, Energy).
Verify all details directly with each provider before making a decision.