RTS Labs vs Addepto: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
RTS Labs (4.4/5) edges ahead of Addepto (4.3/5) overall. RTS Labs is the better choice for U.S. firms needing onshore-only delivery. Addepto is the stronger option for manufacturers connecting AI to engineering data. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
RTS Labs vs Addepto: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | RTS Labs | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2010 | 2018 |
| HQ | Richmond, VA, USA | Warsaw, Poland |
| Team size | 100+ | 50–249 |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | All-U.S. engineering team and early MCP integration work | Integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM |
| Pricing model | Fixed-scope phases and time & materials; rates on request | Fixed-scope projects and time & materials; $50–$99/hr (Clutch band) |
| Min. engagement | Not disclosed | $10,000+ (Clutch) |
| Primary tech stack | Salesforce, Microsoft Dynamics 365, Snowflake | Databricks, Azure OpenAI, Snowflake |
| Industries served | Logistics, Insurance, Legal, Financial services, Real estate, Healthcare | Manufacturing, Energy, Logistics, Retail & e-commerce |
RTS Labs vs Addepto: overview
RTS Labs
RTS Labs has been building software since 2010 from Richmond, Virginia, and now positions itself as an applied-AI consultancy. Its 100-plus staff are all U.S.-based, which matters for clients that can't send data or system access offshore. The firm says it has shipped over 600 software and AI systems and that core implementations usually reach production in 8–12 weeks (per company website; independently unverifiable). It's also one of the few mid-size firms publicly building Model Context Protocol (MCP) server integrations for enterprise tools.
Addepto
Addepto was founded in Warsaw in 2018 and employs 50–100 people according to most directories (Clutch shows 50–249). KMS Technology acquired it in December 2025, and it continues as an independent subsidiary. Its focus is unusual. The integration work leans toward industrial and engineering data, connecting AI to supervisory control (SCADA), computer-aided design (CAD), and product lifecycle management (PLM) systems alongside more common document and analytics projects. Clutch lists a $10,000 minimum and a $50–$99 hourly band, one of the more accessible entry points on this list.
Services and capabilities: RTS Labs vs Addepto
| Capability | RTS Labs | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| CRM / ERP integration | ✓ | ✗ |
| LLM API gateway & cost control | ✓ | ✓ |
| Document processing | ✗ | ✓ |
| Conversational AI | ✗ | ✗ |
| Agentic workflows | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fixed-price pilot | ✗ | ✗ |
| Managed services after launch | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: RTS Labs vs Addepto
| Framework / platform | RTS Labs | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Salesforce | ✓ | N/A |
| SAP | N/A | N/A |
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 | ✓ | N/A |
| HubSpot | N/A | N/A |
| Snowflake | ✓ | ✓ |
| Databricks | N/A | ✓ |
| BigQuery | N/A | N/A |
| Azure OpenAI | ✓ | ✓ |
| AWS Bedrock | ✓ | N/A |
| Zendesk | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: RTS Labs vs Addepto
| Criterion | RTS Labs | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not disclosed | $10,000+ (Clutch) |
| Engagement models | Fixed-scope project, Time & materials, Managed services | Fixed-scope project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Not public | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: RTS Labs vs Addepto
| Dimension | RTS Labs | Addepto |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Logistics, Insurance, Legal | Manufacturing, Energy, Logistics |
| Best use cases | Connecting an agent to a TMS (transportation management system) and ERP for freight exceptions, Building MCP servers so assistants can query internal tools | Search across CAD and PLM records with an LLM front end, Predictive maintenance from SCADA sensor history |
| Typical project type | Fixed-scope project | Fixed-scope project |
RTS Labs vs Addepto: pros and cons
| RTS Labs | |
|---|---|
| + | Every engineer is U.S.-based, which simplifies data-residency and security reviews. |
| + | MCP server work lets agents call internal tools through one standard interface. |
| + | Logistics and insurance case work ties AI into operational systems. |
| + | Offers ongoing support once a system is live. |
| - | Onshore-only staffing means higher rates than nearshore firms |
| - | Its published timelines vary between 90 days and 8–12 weeks depending on the page |
| - | No hyperscaler partner tier is prominent in its materials |
| Addepto | |
|---|---|
| + | The $10K Clutch minimum lets small teams test an integration without a large commitment. |
| + | Experience with plant and engineering systems most AI vendors don't touch. |
| + | Clutch reviews average close to 4.9. |
| + | Data engineering and AI are scoped by the same team. |
| - | Acquired by KMS Technology in December 2025; long-term pricing and branding may change |
| - | Headcount varies a lot between directories |
| - | No managed-service offer for running systems after launch |
Who should choose RTS Labs?
A typical fit: connecting an agent to a TMS (transportation management system) and ERP for freight exceptions.
All-U.S. engineering team and early MCP integration work. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. Works best with clients in Logistics, Insurance, Legal, Financial services, Real estate, Healthcare.
Who should choose Addepto?
A typical fit: search across CAD and PLM records with an LLM front end.
Integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM. Minimum engagement starts at $10,000+ (Clutch). Works best with clients in Manufacturing, Energy, Logistics, Retail & e-commerce.
Decision matrix: RTS Labs vs Addepto
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You want a priced pilot before committing to a rollout | Neither advertises one; ask for a scoped pilot quote |
| You need someone to run and monitor the system after launch | RTS Labs |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: RTS Labs (Not disclosed) vs Addepto ($10,000+ (Clutch)) |
| The AI has to read and write in your CRM or ERP | RTS Labs |
| You need multi-step agents acting across systems | RTS Labs |
| You need a large team for a multi-year program | RTS Labs |
Use case fit: RTS Labs vs Addepto
| Use case | RTS Labs fit | Addepto fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Connecting an agent to a TMS (transportation management system) and ERP for freight exceptions | Strong | Limited | RTS Labs |
| Building MCP servers so assistants can query internal tools | Strong | Limited | RTS Labs |
| Search across CAD and PLM records with an LLM front end | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
| Predictive maintenance from SCADA sensor history | Limited | Strong | Addepto |
Verdict: RTS Labs vs Addepto
RTS Labs (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most AI Integration Services projects. All-U.S. engineering team and early MCP integration work.
Addepto (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need predictive maintenance from SCADA sensor history. If your situation matches that, Addepto is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
RTS Labs vs Addepto FAQ
Is RTS Labs better than Addepto?
RTS Labs (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. RTS Labs's strongest advantage: every engineer is U.S.-based, which simplifies data-residency and security reviews. Addepto's strongest advantage: the $10K Clutch minimum lets small teams test an integration without a large commitment.
How do RTS Labs and Addepto differ in pricing?
RTS Labs's pricing: fixed-scope phases and time & materials; rates on request. Addepto's pricing: fixed-scope projects and time & materials; $50–$99/hr (Clutch band) with a minimum engagement of $10,000+ (Clutch). Any hourly bands shown come from Clutch, not a published rate card, so a scoping call is still needed for a project quote.
Which is better for enterprise: RTS Labs or Addepto?
RTS Labs is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each provider before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between RTS Labs and Addepto?
RTS Labs's primary differentiator is: All-U.S. engineering team and early MCP integration work. Addepto's primary differentiator is: integration work with industrial systems such as SCADA, CAD, and PLM. They also differ in team size (100+ vs 50–249), minimum engagement (Not disclosed vs $10,000+ (Clutch)), and primary industries served (Logistics, Insurance vs Manufacturing, Energy).
Verify all details directly with each provider before making a decision.